Aside from what I said in #1 you can play 2. It's somewhat unusual meaning most black players won't as prepared as they should be. The Vienna gambit with an early f4 is also surprisingly sound. You can play the standard Frankenstein–Dracula Variation or you can transpose to a four knights or you can play something like the Bishop's opening or you can look to transpose into a king's gambit or you can play a very system-like approach with Bc4, d3, f4, Nf3 etc. There are a lot of ways to play the Vienna. It cuts off a lot of black responses like the Petrov, Philidor, Latvian etc. There's only a few openings that can even try to claim a small advantage nowadays (Ruy, Queen's gambit) Objectively it's probably equal but that's true of nearly every opening. The Vienna is one of the better openings below international level. Against an opponent as booked up as you, don't play the Vienna.This is in contrast to, say, the Scandinavian where you might prepare a line but never get the chance to use it. If you play 1.e4 there's a very good chance the opponent responds with 1.e5. Viewed the above way, the Vienna is a great opening because it's easy to get. But until they develop as good a grasp of the Vienna as you, you will likely continue to score easy wins. Of course if you keep playing against the same people they will quickly learn the nuances of the opening, and an opening edge becomes harder and harder to find. However, lines other than 3.d5 give White at least an edge, making this a good choice for aggressive play at lower levels, where opponents are unlikely to know that 3.d5 is best. Qe2 forces Black to play 5.Ng8) or something even worse like 3.Nc6 (after which 4.fxe5 Nxe5 5. They could very well react with 3.exf4 (after which 4. This move flips Stockfish's eval to negative, but if opponent has never seen this position before, will they even know that 3.d5 is the only move that doesn't lead to an advantage for White? I doubt it. In fact it's entirely possible that your opponent is out of book after 1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.f4. At club level you can certainly expect opponents to know a lot more about 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 than they do about the Vienna. "Winning" in the opening is mostly a matter of reaching a playable position one is familiar with while the opponent isn't. However, if you aren't playing at top level (I doubt you are, simply because almost everyone on the planet isn't), then the Vienna is certainly viable. In words, this means the Vienna is not as good as 2.Nf3 at fighting for an opening advantage. The position after 1.e4 e5 is about +0.3 in favor of White, but the position after 1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 is 0.0. You can try checking the cloud analysis at Lichess. The Vienna is the 3rd choice in the Masters database with also a higher variance.Īt top level, the Vienna is certainly inferior. In the Big one, the Vienna game is the second choice and compared to 2.Nf3 it offers a higher risk (more losses) but also a premium (more gains). Here are some stats about the Vienna game compared to others openings in a Big and a Masters database. which pieces to swap, which promising pawn structure to get. So, if Vienna suits you, if you like the obtained positions, if you know the main theme (e.g. Territory, and the Vienna is a perfect arena for this." Variations have been revived by players to looking into unknown It is hardly surprising that some 'forgotten' opening Theory has become so intense that some variations have been analyzed "in these days of computer databases, opening The International Master Gary Lane in his book about the Vienna game wrote in 2000 that this opening "has a long history and a bright future". I then want to ask the opinion of more experienced players than myself: do you consider the Vienna Game to be equally good to other 1.e4 lines, such as the Ruy Lopez or the Scotch? Inferior to them, but still god? Or not even good at all? My question comes from the fact that this opening is hardly ever seen in master play, and it is usually only played on blitz/rapid games as a surprise weapon. Of course, Black has the chance to equalize if he knows what he's doing, but in what opening is this not the case? It offers positional, strategical struggle in some lines, and sharp aggressive play on others, so players of all styles may find it enjoyable. My overall conclusion is that the Vienna Game is a sound, promising line for the 1.e4 player. Apart from this, I have studied quite a number of master games. The principal bifurcation comes on 2.Nf6 or 2.Nc6 by Black, which provides two quite different "systems", since 2.Nf6 allows a strong 3.f4. At this point I have become familiarized with a substantial amount of variations and main lines. I have been taking a look at 1.e4 2.e5 2.Nc3, which is known as the Vienna Game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |